Workflow

From project setup to live review in nine connected stages

See how your team can move from project setup through live review with each stage tied to a practical delivery outcome.

Request a demo

See whether CLEVAIR fits your current HTA workflow

Show us where your team is facing delay, duplication, comparator complexity, evidence pressure, or review friction. We will tailor the discussion around the part of your workflow that needs the most support first.

Request a tailored demo

Step 1

Initialization

Start with one shared project frame so your team is not reworking basic scope decisions later in the process.

Key focus

Set the target drug, indication, and sponsor

Define the countries and HTA scope

Align the team on the project perimeter

Expected output

Shared project frame

Common product context

Cleaner start for dossier work

Step 2

Horizon Scanning

Build early strategic context so comparator work starts from a stronger market view instead of fragmented inputs.

Key focus

Review the treatment landscape

Identify emerging alternatives

Frame the comparator discussion early

Expected output

Shared landscape view

Earlier comparator framing

Stronger context for later steps

Step 3

Competitive Landscape

Validate comparator choices early so downstream evidence, drafting, and review are not weakened by late objections.

Key focus

Validate comparators by market and indication

Check standard-of-care logic

Prepare the evidence base for matching

Expected output

Comparator shortlist

Country-sensitive rationale

Reduced risk of late-stage challenge

Step 4

Regulatory Documents

Keep SmPCs, EPARs, assessment reports, and related anchors together so drafting and review use the same source base.

Key focus

Collect SmPCs and EPARs

Organize core regulatory references

Prepare source context for later drafting

Expected output

Regulatory source library

Traceable product references

Cleaner inputs for dossier work

Step 5

Guidelines & References

Keep the methodological and clinical references your team relies on visible and reusable across the workflow.

Key focus

Import and curate guideline sources

Map references to comparator expectations

Align decision context for the HTA narrative

Expected output

Guidance library

Comparator expectation map

Stronger decision context

Step 6

Clinical Trials

Bring trials, registry signals, and study documents together so evidence work starts from one reusable base.

Key focus

Manage included trials

Connect registry and study documents

Prepare the base for evidence matching

Expected output

Trial repository

Structured study metadata

Ready-to-use evidence base

Step 7

Publications & SLR

Search, curate, and review literature without separating the publication process from the rest of the HTA workflow.

Key focus

Search and curate publications

Run PRISMA-oriented review steps

Track inclusion and exclusion logic

Expected output

Managed publication corpus

Traceable SLR workflow

PRISMA-ready evidence operations

Step 8

PICO Framework

Build or refine PICOs so evidence selection and dossier scope follow the same logic across countries and teams.

Key focus

Create and refine PICOs

Apply national and country logic

Match studies against scope decisions

Expected output

Active PICO set

Country-aware scope logic

Clear bridge to Section 3 generation

Step 9

Documents & Live Review

Turn the workflow into governed deliverables while keeping comments, permissions, exports, and version history attached to the live document.

Key focus

Generate Section 3 and related outputs

Publish word-ready and live documents

Run the review and update loop in one place

Expected output

Structured draft deliverables

Visible live document review

Submission-ready output flow